Thursday, February 12, 2009
The top 5 things wrong with this picture... faces have been changed to protect the innocent.
Lets start with her.
1.) Hair: Terrible. I don't know if she got a super bad dye job or what. But parts of it look red, blonde, dirty blonde brown and black. It could just be the awful lighting of the picture.
2.) More importantly, though, what the @$^# is up with that hair cut? That mess is bad bab BAD all the way around.
3.) Interestingly, she looks like she is leaning away from him and her hands are not so much grasping or holding him, they are more rested/draped on him. It kind of says to me that if they are married or, god forbid, this is some kind of terrible bridal shot.. that she aint to happy to be marrying this catch. But, lets be honest, she is marrying within her caste.
4.) I'm not gonna comment on the clothes, because, shooting fish in a barrel much... but really. Nice lumpy black sweater and skirt. You are portraying the prude/frump look nicely. Kudos!
Now him:
1.)Not much to say... except fix that hair. I don't know if it is spikey or just a poofy afro... either way... its a NO.
2.) And those side burns need to go. NOW!
3.) A white shirt and tie... fer rills?? Good job for being super daring in your wardrobe... even the tie is stripped and boring. Lord... this girl is looking forward to a 60 years of missionary postion on friday nights and that is it. There will be no spark there. Once again, judging by her posture, she is probably ok with touching him in the smallest capacity possible. Really, though, he is barely touching her. Its like they've both realized they have settled for the best they could possibly get. Good for them for staying in thier caste.
I am also going to comment on the stupid plant up in the corner. Seriously, what is up with that. Somebody should have removed it from the picture.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I love it love it love it!
Post a Comment